Authentication in Servant

Once you’ve established the basic routes and semantics of your API, it’s time to consider protecting parts of it. Authentication and authorization are broad and nuanced topics; as servant began to explore this space we started small with one of HTTP’s earliest authentication schemes: Basic Authentication.

Servant 0.5 shipped with out-of-the-box support for Basic Authentication. However, we recognize that every web application is its own beautiful snowflake and are offering experimental support for generalized or ad-hoc authentication.

In this tutorial we’ll build two APIs. One protecting certain routes with Basic Authentication and another protecting the same routes with a custom, in-house authentication scheme.

Basic Authentication

When protecting endpoints with basic authentication, we need to specify two items:

  1. The realm of authentication as per the Basic Authentication spec.
  2. The datatype returned by the server after authentication is verified. This is usually a User or Customer datatype.

With those two items in mind, servant provides the following combinator:

data BasicAuth (realm :: Symbol) (userData :: *)

You can use this combinator to protect an API as follows:

{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds             #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric         #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts      #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances     #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings     #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables   #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies          #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators         #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances  #-}

module Authentication where

import Data.Aeson                       (ToJSON)
import Data.ByteString                  (ByteString)
import Data.Map                         (Map, fromList)
import Data.Monoid                      ((<>))
import qualified Data.Map            as Map
import Data.Proxy                       (Proxy (Proxy))
import Data.Text                        (Text)
import GHC.Generics                     (Generic)
import Network.Wai                      (Request, requestHeaders)
import Network.Wai.Handler.Warp         (run)
import Servant.API                      ((:<|>) ((:<|>)), (:>), BasicAuth,
                                          Get, JSON)
import Servant.API.BasicAuth            (BasicAuthData (BasicAuthData))
import Servant.API.Experimental.Auth    (AuthProtect)
import Servant                          (throwError)
import Servant.Server                   (BasicAuthCheck (BasicAuthCheck),
                                         BasicAuthResult( Authorized
                                                        , Unauthorized
                                         Context ((:.), EmptyContext),
                                         err401, err403, errBody, Server,
                                         serveWithContext, Handler)
import Servant.Server.Experimental.Auth (AuthHandler, AuthServerData,
import Servant.Server.Experimental.Auth()

-- | private data that needs protection
newtype PrivateData = PrivateData { ssshhh :: Text }
  deriving (Eq, Show, Generic)

instance ToJSON PrivateData

-- | public data that anyone can use.
newtype PublicData = PublicData { somedata :: Text }
  deriving (Eq, Show, Generic)

instance ToJSON PublicData

-- | A user we'll grab from the database when we authenticate someone
newtype User = User { userName :: Text }
  deriving (Eq, Show)

-- | a type to wrap our public api
type PublicAPI = Get '[JSON] [PublicData]

-- | a type to wrap our private api
type PrivateAPI = Get '[JSON] PrivateData

-- | our API
type BasicAPI = "public"  :> PublicAPI
           :<|> "private" :> BasicAuth "foo-realm" User :> PrivateAPI

-- | a value holding a proxy of our API type
basicAuthApi :: Proxy BasicAPI
basicAuthApi = Proxy

You can see that we’ve prefixed our public API with “public” and our private API with “private.” Additionally, the private parts of our API use the BasicAuth combinator to protect them under a Basic Authentication scheme (the realm for this authentication is "foo-realm").

Unfortunately we’re not done. When someone makes a request to our "private" API, we’re going to need to provide to servant the logic for validifying usernames and passwords. This adds a certain conceptual wrinkle in servant’s design that we’ll briefly discuss. If you want the TL;DR: we supply a lookup function to servant’s new Context primitive.

Until now, all of servant’s API combinators extracted information from a request or dictated the structure of a response (e.g. a Capture param is pulled from the request path). Now consider an API resource protected by basic authentication. Once the required WWW-Authenticate header is checked, we need to verify the username and password. But how? One solution would be to force an API author to provide a function of type BasicAuthData -> Handler User and servant should use this function to authenticate a request. Unfortunately this didn’t work prior to 0.5 because all of servant’s machinery was engineered around the idea that each combinator can extract information from only the request. We cannot extract the function BasicAuthData -> Handler User from a request! Are we doomed?

Servant 0.5 introduced Context to handle this. The type machinery is beyond the scope of this tutorial, but the idea is simple: provide some data to the serve function, and that data is propagated to the functions that handle each combinator. Using Context, we can supply a function of type BasicAuthData -> Handler User to the BasicAuth combinator handler. This will allow the handler to check authentication and return a User to downstream handlers if successful.

In practice we wrap BasicAuthData -> Handler into a slightly different function to better capture the semantics of basic authentication:

-- | The result of authentication/authorization
data BasicAuthResult usr
  = Unauthorized
  | BadPassword
  | NoSuchUser
  | Authorized usr
  deriving (Eq, Show, Read, Generic, Typeable, Functor)

-- | Datatype wrapping a function used to check authentication.
newtype BasicAuthCheck usr = BasicAuthCheck
  { unBasicAuthCheck :: BasicAuthData
                     -> IO (BasicAuthResult usr)
  deriving (Generic, Typeable, Functor)

We now use this datatype to supply servant with a method to authenticate requests. In this simple example the only valid username and password is "servant" and "server", respectively, but in a real, production application you might do some database lookup here.

-- | 'BasicAuthCheck' holds the handler we'll use to verify a username and password.
authCheck :: BasicAuthCheck User
authCheck =
  let check (BasicAuthData username password) =
        if username == "servant" && password == "server"
        then return (Authorized (User "servant"))
        else return Unauthorized
  in BasicAuthCheck check

And now we create the Context used by servant to find BasicAuthCheck:

-- | We need to supply our handlers with the right Context. In this case,
-- Basic Authentication requires a Context Entry with the 'BasicAuthCheck' value
-- tagged with "foo-tag" This context is then supplied to 'server' and threaded
-- to the BasicAuth HasServer handlers.
basicAuthServerContext :: Context (BasicAuthCheck User ': '[])
basicAuthServerContext = authCheck :. EmptyContext

We’re now ready to write our server method that will tie everything together:

-- | an implementation of our server. Here is where we pass all the handlers to our endpoints.
-- In particular, for the BasicAuth protected handler, we need to supply a function
-- that takes 'User' as an argument.
basicAuthServer :: Server BasicAPI
basicAuthServer =
  let publicAPIHandler = return [PublicData "foo", PublicData "bar"]
      privateAPIHandler (user :: User) = return (PrivateData (userName user))
  in publicAPIHandler :<|> privateAPIHandler

Finally, our main method and a sample session working with our server:

-- | hello, server!
basicAuthMain :: IO ()
basicAuthMain = run 8080 (serveWithContext basicAuthApi

{- Sample session

$ curl -XGET localhost:8080/public

$ curl -iXGET localhost:8080/private
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
transfer-encoding: chunked
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:36:38 GMT
Server: Warp/3.1.8
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="foo-realm"

$ curl -iXGET localhost:8080/private -H "Authorization: Basic c2VydmFudDpzZXJ2ZXI="
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
transfer-encoding: chunked
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:37:58 GMT
Server: Warp/3.1.8
Content-Type: application/json

Generalized Authentication

Sometimes your server’s authentication scheme doesn’t quite fit with the standards (or perhaps servant hasn’t rolled-out support for that new, fancy authentication scheme). For such a scenario, servant 0.5 provides easy and simple experimental support to roll your own authentication.

Why experimental? We worked on the design for authentication for a long time. We really struggled to find a nice, type-safe niche in the design space. In fact, Context came out of this work, and while it really fit for schemes like Basic and JWT, it wasn’t enough to fully support something like OAuth or HMAC, which have flows, roles, and other fancy ceremonies. Further, we weren’t sure how people will use auth.

So, in typical startup fashion, we developed an MVP of ‘generalized auth’ and released it in an experimental module, with the hope of getting feedback from you! So, if you’re reading this or using generalized auth support, please give us your feedback!

What is Generalized Authentication?

TL;DR: you throw a tagged AuthProtect combinator in front of the endpoints you want protected and then supply a function Request -> Handler user which we run anytime a request matches a protected endpoint. It precisely solves the “I just need to protect these endpoints with a function that does some complicated business logic” and nothing more. Behind the scenes we use a type family instance (AuthServerData) and Context to accomplish this.

Generalized Authentication in Action

Let’s implement a trivial authentication scheme. We will protect our API by looking for a cookie named "servant-auth-cookie". This cookie’s value will contain a key from which we can lookup a User.

-- | A user type that we "fetch from the database" after
-- performing authentication
newtype Account = Account { unAccount :: Text }

-- | A (pure) database mapping keys to users.
database :: Map ByteString Account
database = fromList [ ("key1", Account "Anne Briggs")
                    , ("key2", Account "Bruce Cockburn")
                    , ("key3", Account "Ghédalia Tazartès")

-- | A method that, when given a password, will return a Account.
-- This is our bespoke (and bad) authentication logic.
lookupAccount :: ByteString -> Handler Account
lookupAccount key = case Map.lookup key database of
  Nothing -> throwError (err403 { errBody = "Invalid Cookie" })
  Just usr -> return usr

For generalized authentication, servant exposes the AuthHandler type, which is used to wrap the Request -> Handler user logic. Let’s create a value of type AuthHandler Request Account using the above lookupAccount method:

-- | The auth handler wraps a function from Request -> Handler Account
-- we look for a Cookie and pass the value of the cookie to `lookupAccount`.
authHandler :: AuthHandler Request Account
authHandler =
  let handler req = case lookup "servant-auth-cookie" (requestHeaders req) of
        Nothing -> throwError (err401 { errBody = "Missing auth header" })
        Just authCookieKey -> lookupAccount authCookieKey
  in mkAuthHandler handler

Let’s now protect our API with our new, bespoke authentication scheme. We’ll re-use the endpoints from our Basic Authentication example.

-- | Our API, with auth-protection
type AuthGenAPI = "private" :> AuthProtect "cookie-auth" :> PrivateAPI
             :<|> "public"  :> PublicAPI

-- | A value holding our type-level API
genAuthAPI :: Proxy AuthGenAPI
genAuthAPI = Proxy

Now we need to bring everything together for the server. We have the AuthHandler Request Account value and an AuthProtected endpoint. To bind these together, we need to provide a Type Family instance that tells the HasServer instance that our Context will supply a Account (via AuthHandler Request Account) and that downstream combinators will have access to this Account value (or an error will be thrown if authentication fails).

-- | We need to specify the data returned after authentication
type instance AuthServerData (AuthProtect "cookie-auth") = Account

Note that we specify the type-level tag "cookie-auth" when defining the type family instance. This allows us to have multiple authentication schemes protecting a single API.

We now construct the Context for our server, allowing us to instantiate a value of type Server AuthGenAPI, in addition to the server value:

-- | The context that will be made available to request handlers. We supply the
-- "cookie-auth"-tagged request handler defined above, so that the 'HasServer' instance
-- of 'AuthProtect' can extract the handler and run it on the request.
genAuthServerContext :: Context (AuthHandler Request Account ': '[])
genAuthServerContext = authHandler :. EmptyContext

-- | Our API, where we provide all the author-supplied handlers for each end
-- point. Note that 'privateDataFunc' is a function that takes 'Account' as an
-- argument. We dont' worry about the authentication instrumentation here,
-- that is taken care of by supplying context
genAuthServer :: Server AuthGenAPI
genAuthServer =
  let privateDataFunc (Account name) =
          return (PrivateData ("this is a secret: " <> name))
      publicData = return [PublicData "this is a public piece of data"]
  in  privateDataFunc :<|> publicData

We’re now ready to start our server (and provide a sample session)!

-- | run our server
genAuthMain :: IO ()
genAuthMain = run 8080 (serveWithContext genAuthAPI genAuthServerContext genAuthServer)

{- Sample Session:

$ curl -XGET localhost:8080/private
Missing auth header

$ curl -XGET localhost:8080/private -H "servant-auth-cookie: key3"
[{"ssshhh":"this is a secret: Ghédalia Tazartès"}]

$ curl -XGET localhost:8080/private -H "servant-auth-cookie: bad-key"
Invalid Cookie

$ curl -XGET localhost:8080/public
[{"somedata":"this is a public piece of data"}]


Creating a generalized, ad-hoc authentication scheme was fairly straight forward:

  1. use the AuthProtect combinator to protect your API.
  2. choose a application-specific data type used by your server when authentication is successful (in our case this was User).
  3. Create a value of AuthHandler Request User which encapsulates the authentication logic (Request -> Handler User). This function will be executed everytime a request matches a protected route.
  4. Provide an instance of the AuthServerData type family, specifying your application-specific data type returned when authentication is successful (in our case this was User).


  1. The module Servant.Server.Experimental.Auth contains an orphan HasServer instance for the AuthProtect combinator. You may be get orphan instance warnings when using this.
  2. Generalized authentication requires the UndecidableInstances extension.

Client-side Authentication

Basic Authentication

As of 0.5, servant-client comes with support for basic authentication! Endpoints protected by Basic Authentication will require a value of type BasicAuthData to complete the request.

Generalized Authentication

Servant 0.5 also shipped with support for generalized authentication. Similar to the server-side support, clients need to supply an instance of the AuthClientData type family specifying the datatype the client will use to marshal an unauthenticated request into an authenticated request. Generally, this will look like:

-- | The datatype we'll use to authenticate a request. If we were wrapping
-- something like OAuth, this might be a Bearer token.
type instance AuthClientData (AuthProtect "cookie-auth") = String

-- | A method to authenticate a request
authenticateReq :: String -> Req -> Req
authenticateReq s req = SCR.addHeader "my-bespoke-header" s req

Now, if the client method for our protected endpoint was getProtected, then we could perform authenticated requests as follows:

-- | one could curry this to make it simpler to work with.
result = runExceptT (getProtected (mkAuthenticateReq "secret" authenticateReq))